
Super fruit fly may lead to healthier humans
Super fruit fly may lead to healthier humans
In a triumph for pests, scientists have figured out how to make the fruit fly
live longer. But humans still may get something out of the deal. As reported
online in Nature Chemical Biology, the discovery that a single protein can
inhibit aging holds implications for human longevity and for treatment of some
of the world’s most feared diseases.
“This work is important for two reasons,” said study author Richard Roberts,
associate professor of chemistry, chemical engineering and biology at the
University of Southern California.
“First, it demonstrates that a single inhibitor can dramatically alter lifespan,
a very complex trait. It is remarkable that you can alter it with a single
genetic change.
“We don’t really need to make fruit flies live longer, but if we understand how
to do this, our approach may have direct application to higher organisms, such
as ourselves.”
Secondly, Roberts said, the method used by his research group to make the
inhibiting proteins “opens the possibility of developing a lot of new
therapeutics.”
The study describes a new method for blocking receptors involved in aging and
disease across many species, including humans.
Receptors are proteins that transmit signals across a cell membrane. In the
fruit fly, Roberts and his team manufactured short proteins that blocked a
receptor involved in fruit fly aging, as previously demonstrated by co-author
Seymour Benzer of Caltech.
Flies with a blocked receptor saw their lives extended by a third, with no
apparent side effects.
The same blocking strategy should work in all such receptors, known as class B
GPCRs (for G protein-coupled receptors). Many GPCRs figure prominently in
disease as well as in normal development, Roberts said.
“It is the most targeted family of receptors” by drug manufacturers, Roberts
said, estimating that a quarter of all pharmaceuticals focus on GPCRs.
“This approach should be generally applicable.”
And generally powerful, given that GPCRs are notoriously unstable and difficult
to work with. The Roberts group went around the problem by cutting off the
unstable part of the receptor and running experiments only on the part of the
receptor that sticks out of the cell.
Though there were no guarantees that inhibiting one part of the receptor would
incapacitate the whole, the strategy succeeded.
Roberts’ method builds on his co-discovery, in 1997, of a simple method for
building libraries of trillions of short proteins, or peptides.
Unlike DNA, which can be copied and multiplied millions of times with polymerase
chain reaction (PCR), proteins cannot be copied directly.
But Roberts and Jack Szostak of Massachusetts General Hospital thought of fusing
peptides to the bits of messenger RNA that contained their sequence.
“Essentially, we developed a way to do PCR on proteins,” Roberts said.
The use of RNA-peptide fusions allowed the easy creation and multiplication of
randomly generated peptides. Roberts termed this approach “Irrational Design.”
In the new study, Roberts and his group literally threw trillions of peptides at
the receptor and saved the ones that stuck.
“We let the molecules themselves decide if they bind, rather than trying to
design them rationally,” he said.
After multiple cycles, the researchers had a group of peptides that stuck to the
receptor and not to any other protein.
Fruit flies genetically altered to produce such peptides lived longer,
suggesting that the peptides were interfering with the receptor’s normal
function.
Why these particular peptides work, and why the receptor they target plays such
an important role in fruit fly aging, remain the bigger and as yet unanswered
questions.
Print publication of the Nature Chemical Biology study is expected later this
summer.
Add Comment


Common Menu

Article Categories
| Help Topics (5) | |
| Spirituality (15) | |
| Spirit & Destiny (14) | |
| Holistic Health (9) | |
| General Health (1) | |
| Paranormal (11) | |
| Therapies (9) | |
| Self-Improvement (8) | |
| Society and Culture (1) | |
| Disease and Illnesses (1) | |
| Nutrition (1) |


